Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:45:02 +0000 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: altq in main tree? Message-ID: <20040422094502.GA77611@sitetronics.com> In-Reply-To: <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net> References: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Laier <max@love2party.net> scribbled: > On Wednesday 21 April 2004 11:48, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main > > tree in the near future? > > I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the outcome > is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy to do. But as > vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these days, we will > have to see how it works out. > > Also there are some other items on my schedule which must be complete > beforehand. If you have a TODO somewhere, I'd be willing to help out where I can. > -- > Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org > Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet -- Kind regards, Devon H. O'Dell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040422094502.GA77611>