Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:56:08 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Display of bridge member interfaces cut short - bug or intention? Message-ID: <20231221165608.5296355a@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20231220213245.3596498a@bsd64.grem.de> References: <E7DE9D4C-A3E5-4BBE-83D3-D003E4DF9CF2@punkt.de> <20231220213245.3596498a@bsd64.grem.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 21:32:45 +0100 Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:04:36 +0100 > "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > as some probably know we provide web hosting services and we use > > jails for that. > > > > On some particular host we have 255 vnet jails all of which are > > connected to the external interface of the host - renamed to "inet0" > > in our environment - via if_bridge(4) and all managed with iocage. > > > > root@ph003:~ # grep inet0 /iocage/jails/vpro*/config.json|wc -l > > 255 > > > > Of these 251 also have a second epair interface connected to a > > private bridge named "priv1". These are used for connections to the > > central database server which should not be exposed to the Internet. > > > > root@ph003:~ # grep priv1 /iocage/jails/vpro*/config.json | wc -l > > 251 > > > > While looking for a different problem to my great suprise I found > > today that ifconfig truncates the list of member interfaces for both > > bridge instances. And both to the same value of 102, although the > > member numbers are (albeit slightly) different: > > > > root@ph003:~ # ifconfig inet0|grep member:|wc -l > > 102 > > root@ph003:~ # ifconfig priv1 | grep member: | wc -l > > 102 > > > > All 255 jails are connected to the external network and perfectly > > reachable from the Internet. That's why I conclude that the display > > is wrong, not the bridge configuration. > > > > What's happening here? Is this intentional or shall I file a bug > > report? > > > > More importantly: either way is this only cosmetic or will we hit > > another unexpected limit of the number of interfaces that can be > > members of a bridge any time soon? > > > > Hi Patrick, > > I could reproduce the issue and created a fix: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43135 > > As far as I can tell the issue is cosmetic (unless, of course, you > have automation based on libifconfig or the output of the ifconfig > command). > > Best > Michael > The fix landed in main[0] and will be MFCed to releng/13.2. Cheers Michael [0]https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=3d36053ca6d6a17d408c8f92c504e6135dc9d8df -- Michael Gmelin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20231221165608.5296355a>