Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:28:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Moerz <freebsd@ny-central.org>, FreeBSD Virtualization Mailing List <freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: OS Images(Linux/etc) in ports tree Message-ID: <202406301528.45UFSg4N009648@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B1FSigSqO3j1EnHvr2aR%2Bks9WbC53Oyswspvfj9j2GDOG019Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This could be the project that you are interested in : > > https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu Or perhaps just make netboot.xyz run ontop of PXE in bhyve??? https://netboot.xyz (This is actually rather simple to do, use the PXE built into bhyve ED2K to load a full featured iPXE (already in ports), which then loads the netboot.xyz scripts.) I have had this working in the past... > > In your case,it could be called quick bhyve. So let's get started. I'm also > interested in collaborating. > > Il sab 29 giu 2024, 19:49 Chris Moerz <freebsd@ny-central.org> ha scritto: > > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on the > > ports,not necessarily heavy image files. > > > > > > > You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original post > > as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere > > else. May have jumped to conclusions. > > > > We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree. > > Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from > > some public repository though would certainly be fine. > > > > chris > > > > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202406301528.45UFSg4N009648>