Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:09:32 +0000 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven=2D=C5ke_Svensson?= <sa@mbg.se> Cc: User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS over nfs Message-ID: <AANLkTi=9O9J1xo6PohvP9xiRdvjD55etT5sTXzzFHyg9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D0231E1.6010105@mbg.se> References: <4D0231E1.6010105@mbg.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 December 2010 13:57, Sven-=C5ke Svensson <sa@mbg.se> wrote: > Hi > > > I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using > "zfs nfsshare...." as it says in the documentation. Then the system use t= he > file /etc/zfs/exports. > > But I find out that I also can share this directories using the standard > /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares in the same > place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this way? Anybody know? > > System is Freebsd 8.1. > > > Best regards > > Sven-=C5ke Svensson > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > if you put it in exports zfs cant manage it, therefore the zfs filesystem set command becomes redundent and inoperative, so it doesnt fit in with zfs standard way of doing things. Not really an issue but possibly a little confusing. I know its not necessary the case for bsd yet, but on solaris if you have made the jump to zfs, you have most likely gone for a pure zfs installation= , therefore it all hangs together nicely.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=9O9J1xo6PohvP9xiRdvjD55etT5sTXzzFHyg9>