Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:43:17 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, jbryant@tfs.net, dkelly@HiWAAY.net, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? 
Message-ID:  <199710140843.BAA03517@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:46:56 PDT." <21477.876815216@time.cdrom.com> 

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

>From The Desk Of "Jordan K. Hubbard" :
> > This is the same government that thought that hiding a fair-weather 
> > aircraft for 25 years was a worthwhile investment of the taxpayers 
> > money?
> 
> Whoa!  Is someone slamming the F117 here?  Fightin' words!
> 
> Whatever shortcomings the F117 may have in the frailty of its skin
> coating are more than offset by its ability to go after radar sites
> and down SAM corridors after highly defended targets.  It sure beats
> the old days when you sent a couple of B52 "cells" (3 bombers) in
> after the same target and were't too surprised if you lost a couple of
> aircraft in the process.
> 
> Now the B2, on the other hand - that may indeed be a bomber who's
> primary mission no longer justifies its cost.  Better to do today's
                                                               ^^^^^^
It took a whole lot of effort and money to get to the point in which
is no longer warranted to develop sophisticated weapons to defeat the
enemy . It was a war on the management of economy  which have paid dearly for
however we are now free to discuss these issues 8)

	Cheers,
	Amancio
	





home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710140843.BAA03517>