Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:11:37 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: John Polstra <jdp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cvsup-mirror Makefile ports/net/cvsup-mirror/files cvsupd.sh update.sh ports/net/cvsup-mirror/pkg DEINSTALL INSTALL PLIST ports/net/cvsup-mirror/scripts configure Message-ID: <200001280911.JAA00985@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from John Polstra <jdp@FreeBSD.org> of "Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:42:38 PST." <200001280642.WAA34860@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> jdp 2000/01/27 22:42:38 PST
>
> Modified files:
> net/cvsup-mirror Makefile
> net/cvsup-mirror/files cvsupd.sh update.sh
> net/cvsup-mirror/pkg DEINSTALL INSTALL PLIST
> net/cvsup-mirror/scripts configure
> Log:
> This is a fairly substantial upgrade of the cvsup-mirror port. In
> honor of the occasion I have bumped the version number to 1.1.
>
> The port now depends upon the cvsup-bin and cvsupd-bin ports rather
> than on the more trouble-prone cvsup port.
[.....]
??? Shouldn't the cvsup port be fixed rather than avoided ? I'd
prefer that (even at the expense of having a cvsup-newsig port that
uses the modula*newsig ports if necessary) rather than installing
binaries on my machines.
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@FreeBSD.org.uk>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001280911.JAA00985>