Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:07:05 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5
Message-ID:  <20040313020704.GA48962@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru>
References:  <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:49:40AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5?
>=20
> I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5.
>=20
> What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x? The
> ports tree is the same anyway.

It's not, because the dependencies are different.

Kris

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAUmzIWry0BWjoQKURAoc5AKCrJmDMcjoULNFUs8ZiypRFm0v2KACg4toR
uOB9YFzZVmyyBhvfjYjhGqw=
=ErYj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040313020704.GA48962>