Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:09:26 +0200 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Michal Petrucha <johnny64@swissjabber.org> Subject: Re: Build error while upgrading 'kdesdk-3.5.9' to 'kdesdk-3.5.10' (devel/kdesdk3) Message-ID: <200809250109.26900.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <20080924190119.GB3786@georg.localdomain> References: <20080917192625.GA1524@georg.localdomain> <200809212157.55530.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080924190119.GB3786@georg.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 21:01:20 Michal Petrucha wrote:
> First, thanks for your response.
>
> > Did you previously have kde-4 on this machine? ldconfig -r |grep gettext
> > should show a /usr/local/kde4/../libgettext.so, but that isn't usuable,
> > so new port builds will see 'a libgettext', so wont install gettext, but
> > kde's configure finds it is not usuable, so will default to it's internal
> > copy of gettext, which doesn't compile cleanly.
> > cd /usr/ports/devel/kdesdk
> > ${EDITOR} `make -V WRKSRC`/config.log
> > that should show hints why it does not find gettext usable.
> >
> > (Yep, been bitten by it).
>
> Well, I didn't yet install kde4 and I don't intend to. (-:
> Anyway, ldconfig -r | grep gettext shows only the following output:
>
> ~~~~~~
> 271:-lgettextpo.4 => /usr/local/lib/libgettextpo.so.4
> ~~~~~~
>
> I don't understand why it doesn't list libgettextlib.so since it is
> installed by the port devel/gettext (gettext-0.17_1 is installed here)
> I uploaded the whole config.log to
> http://johnny64.fixinko.sk/junk/config.log.kdesdk3
> but I don't see any relevant messages concerning gettext...
Me neither. I have no idea why it wants to use it's own internal gettext.
> But anyway, how did you solve the error you were getting? Do you think
> just running ldconfig will help? Won't it spoil something important?
I solved it by removing the duplicate library, but there are no dupes on your
system.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809250109.26900.fbsd.questions>