Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Nov 2020 13:08:47 +0100
From:      Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r367343 - in head/sys/contrib/openzfs/include/os: freebsd/zfs/sys linux/zfs/sys
Message-ID:  <CAGudoHF8xXOOSgFiogtH5e4kqj4R7kwW6DJmCKSJWAwL7HjA2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201105074702.GA83145@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202011042118.0A4LIq3H077210@repo.freebsd.org> <20201105074702.GA83145@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/5/20, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:18:52PM +0000, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>> New Revision: 367343
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367343
>>
>> Log:
>>   zfs: add branch prediction to ZFS_ENTER and ZFS_VERIFY_ZP macros
>>
>>   They are expected to fail only in corner cases.
>>
>> Modified:
>>   head/sys/contrib/openzfs/include/os/freebsd/zfs/sys/zfs_znode_impl.h
>>   head/sys/contrib/openzfs/include/os/linux/zfs/sys/zfs_znode_impl.h
>
> Since my earlier email was ignored, I'd take this chance to ask again:
> why Linux-specific bits present in the head and had to be updated like
> in this commit?  They shouldn't have made past the vendor branch, no?
>

I don't know the reasoning for putting these files here. I suspect
this is to make merging easier. fwiw I don't think they are a problem.

The patch at hand modified them as it was based on the work against
the upstream repo and followed suit

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGudoHF8xXOOSgFiogtH5e4kqj4R7kwW6DJmCKSJWAwL7HjA2w>