Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:28:39 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any X11 benchmarks out there? Message-ID: <200502102128.47059.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050210102917.GB62061@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050210022849.I1169@odysseus.silby.com> <20050210102917.GB62061@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart16295635.RWRFqfXO9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:59, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-Feb-10 02:31:28 -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > >The only X11 benchmark I could find in my quick searching is xbench, whi= ch > >is very old and doesn't appear to want to build (I didn't try to figure > >out why, I hate makefiles.) > > x11perf or glxgears > > I think both are standard clients. If you're talking glxgears you could run Quake I/II/III timedemos :) (or UT2004..) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart16295635.RWRFqfXO9b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCCz5m5ZPcIHs/zowRAhnqAJ48vTIe5jZdvfXR/AXPxdiQwLsysACeIJu7 0ONlyc27FeKx/NXFf7e3FE0= =+CvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart16295635.RWRFqfXO9b--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502102128.47059.doconnor>