Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:44:10 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Future of RAIDFrame
Message-ID:  <40008E4A.3060604@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <xzpk73zs7sq.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <40007D14.6090205@freebsd.org> <xzpk73zs7sq.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> writes:
> 
>>I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
>>and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD.
> 
> 
> I'm having trouble seeing what RF does that Vinum (or at least a
> properly GEOMified Vinum) can't do...
> 
> DES

Please read the RAIDframe documents at http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/RAIDframe
before you ask again.

Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40008E4A.3060604>