Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:13:04 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports Message-ID: <4F4B4920.9030508@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <201202261630.57372.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> References: <4F46847D.4010908@my.gd> <op.v95ejibz34t2sn@tech304> <4F49F375.5000002@hm.net.br> <201202261630.57372.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/26/12 10:30 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > No matter what effort you put into testing, you can never achieve the robustness of an older release. I still have 7.4 running on one. This can stay until next year. > > So, why do you want to run the latest release on an important machine? You can, but you are not in a position to complain then. > > Erich Do you not see this as a *huge* problem ? This means even fewer testers, again ! This weekend I replaced a server, moved it from 6.4-STABLE to 8.3-PRERELEASE. Hell, as far as I'm concerned it could have stayed on 6.4-STABLE to be honest, but I needed to replace the hardware which was getting old.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4B4920.9030508>