Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:41:05 +0200 From: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. alternatives? Message-ID: <g4of85$d8v$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080624121734.171218nrcilz164k@intranet.encontacto.net> References: <20080619135114.Y1807@kozubik.com> <20080620083906.71332251xw1ckmu8@webmail.leidinger.net> <1213972236.1505.14.camel@scotth.emsphone.com> <20080624083829.T1807@kozubik.com> <20080624121734.171218nrcilz164k@intranet.encontacto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] eculp wrote: > Quoting John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com>: > Thanks, for reminding me but I will put another 100 dollars for the same > but I need it to work on FreeBSD 7 and 8, amd64 and i386 although if > justifiable I could get by without amd64 but would rather not. (My A secret binary under NDA will not make users on all architectures happy (yes, you can compile once, but maintain the port...?). I hope that alternatives (silverlight / moonlight) and gnash will make matters better. Recent gnash snapshots are getting much more usable (0.8.2rc played Youtube movies just fine). Gnash has also some nice features - whitelist/blacklist and debugging so that you can see what URL's is your SWF really accessing. (I have blacklisted some YT statistics immediately). Another feature I like is that movies do not have to autostart - you can play them when you click them. This saves a lot of trouble with hanging/crashing SWF's. Plus, gnash runs as a separate standalone process, so a crash is not that bad. --Marcin [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBSG/ARD2W2v2wY27ZAQMBawP/cSjSGM1qkdZcQlfH3aQljy1hB2jfmz3A /yqz1WketEO95dPXM3ReTzKEiwvcULCEg+T0OdJsJ7GGf46xrD3ZM3Y5yoQ1N7Y6 II0++dGDM7gWz0dmaFKxTQ5bGaKONi3kRDvHkIo38xVeA7yn9Edkq43dtHng7zv2 dHLso8c4Cbk= =8BHN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?g4of85$d8v$1>