Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:51:07 +0900 From: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: HIROSHI OOTA <oota@LSi.nec.co.jp> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@nkth.carrots.uucp.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Subject: Re: setpgrp(1, 1) does not FAIL Message-ID: <200202280551.g1S5p8Pp069580@bunko> In-Reply-To: <cwelj6s0ht.wl@sdlpc374.ulsys.lsi.nec.co.jp> References: <cwu1s3qv94.wl@sdlpc374.ulsys.lsi.nec.co.jp> <200202271041.g1RAf5Vh080359@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <cwelj6s0ht.wl@sdlpc374.ulsys.lsi.nec.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:18:06 +0900, HIROSHI OOTA <oota@LSi.nec.co.jp> said: oota> but, It should return EPERM instead of ESRCH. Because ESRCH oota> means `The requested process does not exist'. Setpgrp(2) should fail in this case because pid 1 (which is usually init(8)) is not a child of the curproc, not due to insufficient privilege. ESRCH means that the target process is not found in the children of the curproc. -- Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202280551.g1S5p8Pp069580>