Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Nov 2015 20:46:57 +0000
From:      "Cui, Cheng" <Cheng.Cui@netapp.com>
To:        "hselasky@FreeBSD.org" <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   question about trimning data "len" conditions in TSO in tcp_output.c
Message-ID:  <C44A2900-40E0-41EF-83B1-6DD4B31DABD5@netapp.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hello Hans,

Sorry if my previous email does not reach you because of a bad subject.

This is Cheng Cui. I am reading the CURRENT FreeBSD code in tcp_output.c, and find this question regarding your change in revision 271946.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c?r1=271946&r2=271945&pathrev=271946

trim data "len" under TSO:

885	                        /*
886	                         * Prevent the last segment from being
887	                         * fractional unless the send sockbuf can be
888	                         * emptied:
889	                         */
890	                        max_len = (tp->t_maxopd - optlen);
891	                        if ((off + len) < sbavail(&so->so_snd)) {    <==
892	                                moff = len % max_len;
893	                                if (moff != 0) {
894	                                        len -= moff;
895	                                        sendalot = 1;
896	                                }
897	                        }

Is there a specific reason that it should skip trimming the data "len" under the condition of "(off + len) == sbavail(&so->so_snd)" in TSO? Because I am wondering if we can trim the data "len" directly without checking the "(off + len)" condition.

Thanks,
--Cheng Cui
NetApp Scale Out Networking




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C44A2900-40E0-41EF-83B1-6DD4B31DABD5>