Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:46:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [Request for Help] Reducing gcc 4.9 compilation warnings Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1504201244350.22210@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmomc3cDDDUt3G6Z46=fWzGdSna2THA7U7f87aK=kXuyobg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG=rPVetxeXcVAB7ripkMtEYGB3Fw18JZH3XpOnRqEf6nvmXdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgnp4c=shS9fc7ijHxqKvgz09vX_ja8dWf%2B2NbjCOvBhiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmomc3cDDDUt3G6Z46=fWzGdSna2THA7U7f87aK=kXuyobg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I just got a booting mips32 kernel using gcc-4.9.2, and boy are there > a lot of warnings. I'm going to start fixing the ones I find - cleaner > code is better code. Mostly. > > (I'd be happy with -Wall -Werror.) I thought that -Wall was a fixed set of warnings nowhere close to all of them (to avoid breaking peoples' builds as new warnings are introduced), and a larger set would be better. (Things like -Wmaybe-uninitialized have too many false positives to be a desirable -Werror target, though.) -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1504201244350.22210>