Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:11:41 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, Aymeric Wibo <obiwac@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: eeaa865edba6 - main - acpi: Fix setting sleep state sysctls to NONE Message-ID: <aWbDHZn06x6bITz4@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <89417c41-4c32-48c5-b049-5d1ca253eeb8@FreeBSD.org> References: <6929b55d.2b59a.8a970bd@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20260108115959.4bc9493930ce880913058e5c@bidouilliste.com> <20260108142338.548865cf1cd31fb18d2b6a2a@bidouilliste.com> <89417c41-4c32-48c5-b049-5d1ca253eeb8@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 09:06:20AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On 1/8/26 08:23, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > Ok so the correct value is 's2mem' but this doesn't seems to be > > documented anywhere in acpi(4) like the warning says. > > OTOH, it seems like if we are using traditional ACPI system states, > we should still be able to call it what it is (S3). That is, for > systems using actual S3 and not S0ix, setting these nodes to S3 > should really continue to work IMO. +1; please don't screw up S-states: traditional naming is probably being used in pretty much every related script, and it's power- sensitive, so we really don't want to get complaints from people losing their data, starting with myself. :-/ ./danfehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aWbDHZn06x6bITz4>