Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      14 Nov 1998 00:10:21 -0600
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>
To:        Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD on i386 memory model
Message-ID:  <86ogqaerea.fsf@detlev.UUCP>
In-Reply-To: Robert Nordier's message of "Sat, 14 Nov 1998 04:20:18 %2B0200 (SAT)"
References:  <199811140220.EAA15033@ceia.nordier.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The transformations between Intel and AT&T syntax can really be
> expressed in about a dozen rules, and there are sed and awk scripts
> around that do a fairly reasonable job of automatic translation.

I posted an article on this here a while back if someone cares to
check the archives.  (It's the only discussion on assembler I recall
being involved in on -hackers.)  There's also a decent overview of the
differences between AT&T and Intel syntax in the gas info file.

Happy hacking,
joelh

-- 
Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org
   Fourth law of programming:
   Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ogqaerea.fsf>