Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:14:34 -0400 From: Larry Sica <lomifeh@earthlink.net> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: mike@adept.org (Mike Hoskins), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CERT VU#539363 Message-ID: <5346C791-E18F-11D6-A5F8-000393A335A2@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <200210170009.KAA02471@caligula.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 08:09 PM, Darren Reed wrote: > In some mail from Mike Hoskins, sie said: >> >> >> I'm sure everyone saw this on Bugtraq, firewalls, firewall-wizards, >> etc... >> But I noticed Apple was quick to resond with a 'we're not vulnerable' >> regarding OS X and wondered if we could draw similar conclusions. > > If they don't do stateful filtering then they are not vulnerable. > > Guess we know what version of ipfw is/isn't in OSX then, eh ? > 10.2 does do state. --Larry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5346C791-E18F-11D6-A5F8-000393A335A2>