Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:11:09 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/i386/conf NOT Message-ID: <20000629091109.L275@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <xzphfadvsc8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 09:50:31AM %2B0200 References: <200006281721.KAA03683@john.baldwin.cx> <xzphfadvsc8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> [000629 00:50] wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes: > > On 28-Jun-00 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > I know. But in any case, you didn't specify *how* HTTPACCEPT fails to > > > work with HTTP 0.9. If it wakes the process up too early, no problem > > > (you're no worse off than without HTTPACCETPT). But if it never wakes > > > up the process (because it keeps waiting for more header lines), > > > that's not acceptable. > > It waits for a full HTTP/1.0 header, i.e. one including a blank line. > > Thus, it won't ever return the socket as ready if a server uses a 0.9 > > request.. > > Give me a D! Give me an O! Give me an S! What do you get? C'mon man you're the one that showed me how this stuff all works UTSL please. thanks, -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000629091109.L275>