Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:25:28 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, Tobias Roth <roth@iam.unibe.ch>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? Message-ID: <42E477C8.5020207@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050724193726.GA11019@soaustin.net> References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724155225.GA10448@soaustin.net> <20050724184444.GA2527@droopy.unibe.ch> <20050724193726.GA11019@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 08:44:44PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote: > >>>So does this mean that 37596 needs to be reopened? Sem? >> >>'Someone' was me, and I can confirm that 37596 still is a problem >>as of today with -STABLE. That's why I pointed Mike to it and asked >>him to keep sem@ in the loop. > > > OK, as bugmeister I'm going to reopen it and mark it as 'suspended' > while the fix is being worked on, because it's my belief that that's > the way it should have been set in the first place. > > I'm quite aggressive in closing PRs ... when it's clear the problem > has been fixed or the circumstances no longer relevant, but that > doesn't sound like the case here. > > mcl OK. I see your point. So I'll place my patches (quite simple really) in the PR for review (there will a patch for bsd.port.mk too). -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42E477C8.5020207>