Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:00:09 +0200 From: "Zuidam, Hans" <Hans.Zuidam@nl.origin-it.com> To: "'Brian Beattie'" <beattie@aracnet.com> Cc: "'hackers@freebsd.org'" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: natd question Message-ID: <9B7E8CE3E214D311A3050008C7A4BDDB934696@nlehx061.ehvvon.nl.origin-it.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Beattie [mailto:beattie@aracnet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 19 October, 1999 19:27 > How about: > > (~~~~~~~~~~) (~~~~~~~~~~) > ( ) +-------+ +-------+ ( ) > + + | | | | + + > ( 130.144.120/22 ) -- |FreeBSD| ---- |FreeBSD| --( 130.144.120/22 ) > + (real) + | | | | + (test) + > ( ) +-------+ +-------+ ( ) > (~~~~~~~~~~) (~~~~~~~~~~) > > Using 10.0.0.0 on the network in the middle That will only work if the link in the middle is a point-to-point link. Hmmm, maybe PLIP will give some reasonable performance there. The other "solution" would be to have an ARP table for each individual interface for the duplicate addresses. This would involve an extensive of the ARP code to which I'm not quite up to. Regards, Hans -- Hans Zuidam e-mail: hans.zuidam@nl.origin-it.com Origin, BAS/AM-CE tel. +31 40 2735569 Gebouw SK-520 fax. +31 40 2736936 Glaslaan 2 5616 LW Eindhoven To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9B7E8CE3E214D311A3050008C7A4BDDB934696>