Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:48:37 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r242102 - in head: contrib/bmake usr.bin/bmake
Message-ID:  <20121114184837.GA73505@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20121114172823.GA20127@dragon.NUXI.org>
References:  <201210252318.q9PNI6IQ069461@svn.freebsd.org> <20121114172823.GA20127@dragon.NUXI.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--xgpTOYv2eOcVlqnL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +0000, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> > Log:
> >   Merge bmake-20121010
>=20
> Hi Simon,
> I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked.
>=20
> Can you change it to being statically linked?
>=20
>=20
> This issue most recently came up in freebsd-current.  See thread pieces
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033460.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033472.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033473.html

As you see, I prefer to not introduce new statically linked binaries into b=
ase.
If, for unfortunate turns of events, bmake is changed to be statically link=
ed,
please obey WITH_SHARED_TOOLCHAIN.

--xgpTOYv2eOcVlqnL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCj54QACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4j2KwCdFCeKZwbsayD3Iwd3SYh4cQU6
JbUAnjE86zXlqyHrlfNe+SG/In+Wd7+M
=mvPo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xgpTOYv2eOcVlqnL--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121114184837.GA73505>