Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:48:37 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r242102 - in head: contrib/bmake usr.bin/bmake Message-ID: <20121114184837.GA73505@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20121114172823.GA20127@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201210252318.q9PNI6IQ069461@svn.freebsd.org> <20121114172823.GA20127@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +0000, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > Log: > > Merge bmake-20121010 > > Hi Simon, > I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked. > > Can you change it to being statically linked? > > > This issue most recently came up in freebsd-current. See thread pieces > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033460.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033472.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033473.html As you see, I prefer to not introduce new statically linked binaries into base. If, for unfortunate turns of events, bmake is changed to be statically linked, please obey WITH_SHARED_TOOLCHAIN. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCj54QACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4j2KwCdFCeKZwbsayD3Iwd3SYh4cQU6 JbUAnjE86zXlqyHrlfNe+SG/In+Wd7+M =mvPo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121114184837.GA73505>