Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:22:39 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: alc@FreeBSD.ORG, tanimura@FreeBSD.ORG, jake@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: Need help fixing lock ordering with filedesc, proc and pipe. Message-ID: <XFMail.20030103132239.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200301031805.h03I5Gt8064163@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03-Jan-2003 Matthew Dillon wrote: > Hmm. There seem to be multiple issues here but would defering the > psigio also be a workable solution? That is, simply add a flag to > the filedesc and return and the caller (or his caller) is responsible > for checking the flag and calling psigio in a more controlled situation. > This way sigio can be initiated deep in the code without any worries. I would like that as well if it can be cleanly done that way. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030103132239.jhb>