Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:37:37 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch Message-ID: <ek92so$sp7$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20061125083605.GA17350@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org> <200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca> <7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net> <200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca> <20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca> <1164356894.4306.1.camel@massimo.datacode.it> <200611242027.kAOKRYZg012113@lava.sentex.ca> <20061124210305.GA49228@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <200611242117.kAOLHuBP012313@lava.sentex.ca> <20061125083605.GA17350@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Divacky Roman wrote: > hm.. now I am confused. the rule is that having I586_CPU improves > performance because optimized bzero/bcopy is included (its not > included if you only have I686_CPU). > > I dont understand why the generic version is used. I believe the consensus was that I486 line disables it, i.e. to leave just I586 and I686 in.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ek92so$sp7$1>