Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:39:56 +0300 From: atar <atar.yosef@gmail.com> To: sergio de Almeida Lenzi <lenzi.sergio@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TL-WN722N support on FreeBSD. Message-ID: <5811EA5F-C819-4D1B-8D39-7C47E46FFF05@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1409070456.4218.7.camel@lenzinote.lenzicasa> References: <C18F5819-A884-4A86-9FBA-FF7CEFF70695@gmail.com> <53FC60AB.1060805@qeng-ho.org> <1EE2934C-DA78-451F-B86A-93A9C55B9C56@gmail.com> <CADGo8CWQ=D32oYAjx_GxWUvmdeR2r8Qmp2wecD=dDaL3r2ERig@mail.gmail.com> <2ACC59D6-251B-4FF7-A275-C81408D6BB48@gmail.com> <1409070456.4218.7.camel@lenzinote.lenzicasa>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So you give me additional reason to stay with Linux and not to migrate to Fre= eBSD since even a basic wireless adapter which came with your Sony isn't sup= ported by FreeBSD. To be honest, I don't know if your Sony wireless adapter i= s supported by Linux, but in general, I think linux is more flexible and sup= ports more devices than FreeBSD (and more than all the rest of *BSD variatio= ns). > I bought a TL-WN725N and a TL-WN723N > the model WN725N is better, and smaller=20 > both from tplink > and both works out of the box with FreeBSD 10 stable AMD64 > I use them on a sony that have a wireless chip not recognizeable by FreeBS= D. > the only "catch" is to load the driver at boot (loader.conf) and accept th= e licence... > if_urtwn_load=3DYES > legal.realtek.license_ack=3D1 >=20 >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5811EA5F-C819-4D1B-8D39-7C47E46FFF05>