Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 21:38:04 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Bradley Kite <bradley@deathsgate.demon.co.uk> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Reiserfs on Freebsd Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020301213403.94041I-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20020301224616.A12630@deathsgate.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Bradley Kite wrote: > The reason is convenience (dont want to have to reboot every time I need > that 2k file in Linux) - you may well ask why FreeBSD supports NTFS + FAT > > > Why? Softupdates does a better job than logging does. :) > [snip] > > Your assumptions are correct however your belief that it's a simple > > task may be a mistake. :) > > And also it will teach me a lot about both Linux + FreeBSD kernel > internals Unfortunately, it's probably one of those tasks where you want to go in knowing those things, too :-). Suffice to say that, despite Alfred's skepticism, there probably is interest in this in the FreeBSD community, although perhaps not for the reasons you cite. I personally would be interested in seeing the full data journalling for reliability in some environments. I won't discourage you from giving it a spin, of course :-) Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020301213403.94041I-100000>