Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 13:41:37 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: "G. Adam Stanislav" <adam@whizkidtech.net> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: c9x (new ANSI C) Message-ID: <199905201941.NAA07094@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 May 1999 18:01:51 CDT." <19990519180151.A226@whizkidtech.net> References: <19990519180151.A226@whizkidtech.net> <19990519170823.A240@whizkidtech.net> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905191811090.69006-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990519180151.A226@whizkidtech.net> "G. Adam Stanislav" writes: : And the MS book was outright lying (gee, surprise): It claimed that : one of the biggest advantages of C++ over C is that if you change : the C++ class, you need not recompile the code using it. What a : piece of bunk. In C++ the caller allocates the memory called by the : class. Some SGI compilers get around this somehow. They are really much nicer to work with than the cfront based compilers and their descendants. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905201941.NAA07094>