Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:36:54 -0500 (EST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Phil Oleson <oz@nixil.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: request: libedit sync Message-ID: <20050401203604.B22960@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <424DD28E.9040000@nixil.net> References: <4244AC9C.7010803@nixil.net> <20050326030927.GA86483@xor.obsecurity.org> <424CAF89.60209@nixil.net> <20050331233821.Q328@sasami.jurai.net> <424DD28E.9040000@nixil.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Phil Oleson wrote: > hmm.. that was a detail I overlooked. I have not been able to track > down where these functions are used. Can you assist with that? These > calls could be changed to use el_get(el, EL_CLIENTDATA, data) && > el_set(el, EL_CLIENTDATA, data), and we could eliminate these > non-portable local changes. Your suggested change sounds fine. -- 10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050401203604.B22960>