Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 19:23:50 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r262282 - in head: contrib/dma contrib/dma/debian contrib/dma/debian/migrate contrib/dma/debian/source contrib/dma/test etc/mtree libexec libexec/dma share/mk tools/build/mk tools/build... Message-ID: <20140222082350.GA2705@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <201402210726.s1L7QnBP007144@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201402210726.s1L7QnBP007144@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-Feb-21 07:26:49 +0000, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >Log: > Import Dragonfly Mail Agent into base system I would like to suggest that 'dma' is a _really_ bad name for any utility. As has been mentioned, 'DMA' has had a well-entrenched meaning for decades and overloading to also refer to a MTA is not going to end well. I'd also query the reason for including Debian-specific code in the FreeBSD base. --=20 Peter Jeremy --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iKYEARECAGYFAlMIXpZfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDBCRjc3QTcyNTg5NEVCRTY0RjREN0VFRUZF OEE0N0JGRjAwRkI4ODcACgkQ/opHv/APuId60QCggd2vnqXHgtgfpomFyRiyZIdn B3gAmwQu1RmaqRemp4X0hBdfrQM2XcuR =Nm6I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140222082350.GA2705>