Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:05:02 +0200 From: Davide Italiano <davide.italiano@gmail.com> To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Interesting panic from the Yahoo builder (10-current) Message-ID: <CACYV=-EUgCZ5UZ8MURML=AOY9J2GKoF43wegXJiMcssoRJO7Kg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1378483253.1598.3.camel@localhost> References: <1378483253.1598.3.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> wrote: > Our "yBSD" builder needs to mount a disk image temporarily that has a > dos partition (for openstack-ish things) to put configs into it. It > seems that under high stress, we can squeeze a panic out of it in > namei(). > > Sean > > > Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: > panic: namei: nameiop contaminated with flags > cpuid = 8 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe048d8e53b0 > kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5460 > vpanic() at vpanic+0x126/frame 0xfffffe048d8e54a0 > kassert_panic() at kassert_panic+0x136/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5510 > namei() at namei+0x2c8/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5600 > msdosfs_mount() at msdosfs_mount+0x556/frame 0xfffffe048d8e57c0 > vfs_donmount() at vfs_donmount+0xc35/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5aa0 > sys_nmount() at sys_nmount+0x72/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5ae0 > amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x223/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5bf0 > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xfb/frame 0xfffffe048d8e5bf0 > --- syscall (378, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_nmount), rip = 0x8000a8b68a, rsp = 0x7fffffffd508, rbp = 0x7fffffffdb30 --- > Uptime: 34m55s > Dumping 1140 out of 16350 MB:..2%..12%..22%..31%..41%..51%..61%..71%..82%..92% > > Reading symbols from /boot/modules/msdosfs.ko...done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/modules/msdosfs.ko > #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:227 > 227 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. > in pcpu.h > (kgdb) Hangup detected on fd 0 > error detected on stdin Can you please print the value of cnp->cn_nameiop (or, even better, the whole struct) before the panic? Thanks, -- Davide "A mathematical theory is not to be considered complete until you have made it so clear that you can explain it to the first man whom you meet on the street." (D. Hilbert)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACYV=-EUgCZ5UZ8MURML=AOY9J2GKoF43wegXJiMcssoRJO7Kg>