Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:20:28 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>
Cc:        ????????? Bill Hacker <askbill@conducive.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tinderbox
Message-ID:  <20071120152028.GA72317@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071119223350.GA2137@what-creek.com>
References:  <47420100.2050700@conducive.net> <20071119223350.GA2137@what-creek.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:33:50PM +0000, John Birrell wrote:
> Unfortunately the tinderboxes run with custom CFLAGS.
> I would change this if I could, but I'm not the first to mention
> how frustrating it is. I have never seen a good argument for why
> the tinderbox is different from the CVS defaults.

One reason is that some of us (at least) have dreams of not compiling
with -strict-aliasing.  If we have any hope of doing so - the tenderbox
needs to build without to keep new warnings of creaping up.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071120152028.GA72317>