Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:19:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-Current and gcc 4.x Message-ID: <20050622221942.GA36733@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050619043539.GA46516@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <42B409A7.5020909@mail.uni-mainz.de> <42B417C7.80904@samsco.org> <20050619043539.GA46516@dragon.NUXI.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 09:35:39PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 06:47:03AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > Given all the disruptions in the past 3 years over gcc > > 3.x, I think it would be nice to take a small break and not be on the > > bleeding edge of gcc. > > I think you're grossly over exagerating the "disruptions" over GCC 3.x. The ABI breakage at numerous points early in the GCC 3.x branch was extremely disruptive. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCueP+Wry0BWjoQKURAgy/AKCPyMp1pIcZ2g2QSlyyWn/iDsaTOACfTQvo O2EDmRsARW9SuQvc+EZiAbs= =u1Sn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050622221942.GA36733>