Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 18:57:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237429] bhyve: Performance regression after 12 upgrade Message-ID: <bug-237429-27103-Vd6mJTCBft@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237429-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237429-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237429 --- Comment #10 from Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to doctor from comment #9) > 1) In case I wish to expand to say 64G RAM I can do so without trying to = rebuild the server. Ok, valid, thanks for clarifing. > 2)Running UFS not ZFS. Did I forget to mention this? Your system shows it has loaded ZFS: ZFS filesystem version: 5 ZFS storage pool version: features support (5000) you can say your not using it, but your dmesg says differently. > 3) In 11.2 There were not problems. in 12.0 These problems suddenly mani= fested. Are you certain that the only change is that of from 11.2 to 12.0, or did some other change, perhaps a change not considered is the cause of issues. I am simply trying to identify what performance would be low on 12.0 independent of any prior status. > 4) I was able to put up to 8 VM in 11.2 and below without issue. 8 VM's with 4G each on 11.2 with 16G of memory, I do not accept this as tru= e, that is 32G of memory commit + host memory needs. That should of been tras= hing itself unless those 8vm's are pretty well idle --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237429-27103-Vd6mJTCBft>