Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 19:20:50 +0200 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org> To: "Brian T.Schellenberger" <bts@babbleon.org> Cc: dave@jetcafe.org, brooks@one-eyed-alien.net, kudzu@tenebras.com, tlambert2@MINDSPRING.COM, drew@mykitchentable.net, bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Difference between RELENG_* and RELENG_*_BP Message-ID: <20020503192050.0d9f7f29.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020503131502.28B45BB29@i8k.babbleon.org> References: <200205030637.g436bab89675@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> <20020503131502.28B45BB29@i8k.babbleon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 May 2002 09:15:01 -0400
Brian T.Schellenberger <bts@babbleon.org> wrote:
BTS> Stable is, in fact, fairly stable. I mean, if you are going to track updates
I would go so far as to say that -stable is remarkably stable. So
much so that it is easily mistaken for some kind of magicly tested prerelease
track. The fact that this mistake can be made is an impressive tribute to the
committers involved, the fact that it can be made so often is even more
impressive. The most effective way to reduce expectations on the branch
would probably be to break it more often - I am quite happy with this not
being tried :)
--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors
The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see:
| http://www.sohara.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020503192050.0d9f7f29.steve>