Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:29:12 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache? Message-ID: <4C84ECA8.8080807@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Mpm4a9rYzDfWVRuKTTCUJw0j2tEQTF0qjG1=G@mail.gmail.com> References: <5DB6E7C798E44D33A05673F4B773405E@multiplay.co.uk> <AANLkTi=6bta-Obrh2ejLCHENEbhV5stbMsvfek3Ki4ba@mail.gmail.com> <4C825D65.3040004@DataIX.net> <7EA7AD058C0143B2BF2471CC121C1687@multiplay.co.uk> <1F64110BFBD5468B8B26879A9D8C94EF@multiplay.co.uk> <4C83A214.1080204@DataIX.net> <06B9D23F202D4DB88D69B7C4507986B7@multiplay.co.uk> <4C842905.2080602@DataIX.net> <330B5DB2215F43899ABAEC2CF71C2EE0@multiplay.co.uk> <4C84341D.8060708@DataIX.net> <AANLkTi=Mpm4a9rYzDfWVRuKTTCUJw0j2tEQTF0qjG1=G@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/06/2010 01:33, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > All this patches should be posted on the zfs wiki. Make it much easier > for ppl to find it rather then digging through all the mailing lists. > Please see below comments. > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v15/stable-8-v15.patch >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/zfs_metaslab_v2.patch >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/zfs_abe_stat_rrwlock.patch These patches will end up being MFC'd quoting mm@ sometime around ~September / Novemberish. All the patches mentioned are already in HEAD so its just a matter of time before it gets down to another branch. ZFSv15 had quite the number of bug fixes too so it would be wise to update your source to this and gain stability. The patches mentioned above also have bug fix descriptions along side of them in the same directory if you happen to be browsing through. -- jhell,v
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C84ECA8.8080807>