Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:46:32 +0200 From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no> To: stijn@win.tue.nl Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI Regression in -CURRENT? Message-ID: <20030612004632C.hanche@math.ntnu.no> In-Reply-To: <20030611212208.GF24593@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20030610135856.GQ12096@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030611201826J.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20030611212208.GF24593@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+ Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>: | > I tried that on my Inspiron 4150 with 5.1-RELEASE. The patch failed, | > but only for trivial reasons like different placment of braces. | | Note that you have to patch the output of iasl -d, *NOT* the .asl file | that acpidump generates. There is a difference although they look alike. Aha. But the diff you included clearly indicated it was a patch for insp4150.asl. When I told patch to patch insp4150.dsl instead, using your patch, it applied cleanly, and moreover the fix now works to the extent that I don't get those error messages anymore. To be precise, I followed your exact instructions with this difference: # patch insp4150.dsl insp4150.patch | > Actually, acpiconf -s 3 seems to "almost" work: [...] | | According to Mark, this actually should work from within X -- | something to do with DPMS. Still doesn't for me. Same result. Maybe I should learn what DPMS stands for. - Harald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030612004632C.hanche>