Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:00:45 -0400 From: Mark Conway Wirt <mark@intrepid.net> To: jfesler@gigo.com, Stuart Henderson <stuart@eclipse.net.uk> Cc: Bryan Bunch <bryanb@walls-media.com>, "Mike Avery (on the road)" <mavery@mail.otherwhen.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? Message-ID: <19990625230045.E27652@intrepid.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906250942590.14904-100000@heaven.gigo.com>; from jfesler@gigo.com on Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 09:44:16AM -0700 References: <3773B194.BAC2F717@eclipse.net.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906250942590.14904-100000@heaven.gigo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 09:44:16AM -0700, jfesler@gigo.com wrote: > > Exchange doesn't even let you use ETRN if you use an ISDN router. > > Somebody (can't remember who off hand) made a "etrn.exe" for windows. It > didn't care what mail program you ran or anything else. It simply asked > for etrn. Our on-demand ISDN users used it as an event; the network > traffic caused the routers to dial automaticly. It worked well for them, > regardless of whether it was exchange, notes, or whatever other hoaky > excuse for smtp they had... > On a positive note, I have more and more clients asking for us to implement a UNIX based mail server for them. Usually the ask for Linux, but I guess that's what's in the news. I have at least one that's considering FreeBSD. Couple 'o years ago, no one would have asked for UNIX :-) --Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990625230045.E27652>