Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Sep 2004 12:09:54 -0700
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bug reports requested - acpi
Message-ID:  <413E0782.5070102@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <413E0106.9060905@cronyx.ru>
References:  <412D02FE.2080805@root.org> <412F141E.5070102@cronyx.ru> <412F6283.7000900@root.org> <412F692D.7090007@cronyx.ru> <412FAAB2.3000407@root.org> <412FAD67.6050707@cronyx.ru> <413DF483.7050705@root.org> <413DF8A3.9060809@cronyx.ru> <413DFD6A.4030701@root.org> <413E0106.9060905@cronyx.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
>>
>> Please answer yes or no:  ACPI enabled but APIC disabled works 100%? 
>> Safe mode disables both ACPI and APIC so it's not a good test of where 
>> the problem is.  You should probably also test with ACPI disabled but 
>> APIC enabled ("set hint.acpi.0.disabled=1").
> 
> default both enabled, so :
> acpi.disabled - do not work
> apic.disabled - do work

Ok, so let's see why enabling apic affects your system.  Please send the 
output (privately) of acpidump -t -d > rik.asl and output of dmesg.

-- 
Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?413E0782.5070102>