Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 11:28:53 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rejecting spam, accepting valid mail (was: Mail blocked) Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020310112625.02d94940@nospam.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <d1lmd1dwzm.md1@localhost.localdomain> References: <20020308190102.B679@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020307094130.01f59240@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020306234510.01ee0180@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020306234510.01ee0180@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020307094130.01f59240@nospam.lariat.org> <3cg03ccef4.03c@localhost.localdomain> <4.3.2.7.2.20020307221616.00cb9980@nospam.lariat.org> <20020308190102.B679@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:37 PM 3/9/2002, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >> The correct solution to this one is to fix the rule, not continue >> using invalid hostnames. > >It isn't an invalid hostname, it's an invalid message ID It conforms to the RFC so long as it's reasonably likely to be unique. Which it is, due to the way the other side of the "@" is generated on most mail programs. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020310112625.02d94940>