Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:08:35 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        jack <jack@germanium.xtalwind.net>
Cc:        John Kelly <jak@cetlink.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Sendmail - low on space
Message-ID:  <19980128140835.25181@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980127222325.9843C-100000@germanium.xtalwind.net>; from jack on Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 10:33:02PM -0500
References:  <34cfac75.10985109@mail.cetlink.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980127222325.9843C-100000@germanium.xtalwind.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 10:33:02PM -0500, jack wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, John Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:24:55 -0500 (EST), Andrew Webster
>> <andrew@guardian.fortress.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I create my systems without a physical /var parition and symlink /var and
>>> /tmp into /usr/var and /usr/tmp respectively, this eliminates all
>>> problems, and you don't end up "wasting" lots of disk space for temporary
>>> files.
>>
>> I do the same thing on every install.
>>
>>> Can we make this the default of sysinstall?
>>
>> I would like it too.
>
> I wouldn't.
>
>>  I see little benefit in a partition dedicated to /var.
>
> I do.  I like the fact that the / partition, with the critical system
> files, is not written to each time a log entry is made, mail is received,
> accounting records the user's commands, etc.  I like the fact that / can
> be mounted read only so clueless or malicious users can't touch it.  I'd
> like to see /tmp made a link to /var/tmp by default.

I think you're missing the point.  Nobody's advocating doing away with
the /usr file system.

Greg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980128140835.25181>