Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 22:24:20 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/camcontrol Makefile camcontrol.c Message-ID: <20020117222420.A38662@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020117214621.A19869@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from j@uriah.heep.sax.de on Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:46:21PM %2B0100 References: <200201172026.g0HKQES73581@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020117213458.A38235@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20020117214621.A19869@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > As Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > Provide an option to make camcontrol `minimalistic': if the (env/make) > > > variable RELEASE_BUILD_FIXIT is defined, a camcontrol binary will be > > > built that only knows the "rescan" and "reset" subcommands. The > > > resulting code is small enough to still fit onto the boot floppy. > > > > Is it also possible without bloating it to have 'devlist' ? .. > devlist adds a good part of further code (like handling /dev/passN) > plus probably a number of constant strings. > > > This question is triggered by me just overwriting the wrong disk > > on my Alpha during a RC test :-/ > > That reminds me: could you test it in a "make release" on the Alpha? I don't have a current -current, only an ancient -current ;-) on alpha. My kit is building 4.5RCs etc. Not that that makes much progress :-/ -- | / o / /_ _ email: wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020117222420.A38662>