Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:38:40 -0700 From: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD 64 stability Message-ID: <20060223113840.78b0a1c2.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <43FE010F.8040501@datafarm.de> References: <43FCEF9C.5050308@bluelight.org.uk> <200602231537.31325.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> <200602230937.44464.vayua@sklinks.com> <43FE010F.8040501@datafarm.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:38:07 +0100 "V. T. Mueller" <freebsd-amd64@datafarm.de> wrote: > > Since the original question was related to 'server' usage... the > compatibilty list tells if the components found on a single board > (along with its BIOS) are supported. It doesn't statethat a specific > combination or future setup will work. > > For example, we just had to find out that iir-based icp controllers > work extraordinarily fine as long as <4G RAM are used. Upgrading > memory beyond 4G turns your big server(s) into one really big problem. > > I just filed a bug report. > > So before taking decision for software/hardware that is expected to > run hundreds of miles away, it would be reasonable to also take > system changes into account that may be planned for the future. This in reference to the A8V?? -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060223113840.78b0a1c2.kgunders>