Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:30:17 +0800 From: darcsis@gmail.com (Denise H. G.) To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should Gnome2 meta port include security/pinentry-gtk2? Message-ID: <86ljt7hq92.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> In-Reply-To: <1232246393.51752.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> (Joe Marcus Clarke's message of "Sat\, 17 Jan 2009 21\:39\:53 -0500") References: <86vdsghdum.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> <1232157465.1547.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <864ozyskxn.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> <1232246393.51752.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> writes: > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 10:52 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: >> Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:56 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: >> >> It seems that without security/pinentry-gtk2, seahorse wouldn't get full >> >> functions, such as adding new names to an existing key. >> > >> > Is this documented anywhere? >> > >> > Joe >> > >> >> I haven't found it on seahorse's official site. But I got this on >> redhat's bug archives and gentoo's: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474419 >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159505 > > Interesting because I don't see anywhere in the seahorse code where > pinentry is executed. In fact, seahorse is working just fine for me > without pinentry. Can you provide a sequence I can test which will > illustrate the problem caused by lacking pinentry-gtk2? > > Joe Just now I deinstalled pinentry-gtk2, and everything is OK within seahorse... It is very weird. I don't test with other apps, just perform some actions within seahorse like adding/deleting names from an existing key. It seems that this possible issue with seahorse just emerges in a fresh new install of Gnome? Thanks. -- darcsis ZAI gmail DIAN com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ljt7hq92.fsf>