Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:04:59 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Angelo Turetta <aturetta@commit.it> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces? Message-ID: <20090603200459.GG28486@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <4A26A239.5050608@commit.it> References: <4A257B82.1000701@FreeBSD.org> <4A26A239.5050608@commit.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gvF4niNJ+uBMJnEh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> If you use a value of network_interfaces other than AUTO please speak >> up so that we can make an intelligent decision about this issue. >=20 > Maybe I am wrong, setting network_interfaces is the way I found I had to= =20 > use to be able to rename cloned interfaces. >=20 > eg: >=20 > network_interfaces=3D"lo0 em0 dmz" > ifconfig_em0=3D"up" > cloned_interfaces=3D"vlan0" >=20 > ifconfig_vlan0_name=3D"dmz" > ifconfig_dmz=3D"192.168.34.129/24 vlan 2 vlandev em0" >=20 > I seem to remember I had to put that 'dmz' in network_interfaces, to make= =20 > everything happy at boot. I can do more tests if needed. Hmm, there might be a bug related to cloned interfaces and renaming. That should be easy to fix. -- Brooks --gvF4niNJ+uBMJnEh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKJtdrXY6L6fI4GtQRAg2OAJ9Vm/SWtVbWsvK9T00xfd1+8WrmAACglhIi rcFHXO28RxL5F1XHew+EPxw= =R/2Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gvF4niNJ+uBMJnEh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090603200459.GG28486>