Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 20:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: gibbs@plutotech.com Cc: tom@sdf.com, KILLSPAM%mlghome@home.com, weeteck@eecs.umich.edu, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance Message-ID: <199802190448.UAA15764@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199802182146.OAA25726@pluto.plutotech.com> (gibbs@plutotech.com)
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
* Many recent Seagate drives are okay, but when I have the choice, I pick
* IBM over Seagate. This has as much to do with reliability as with how
* well behaved SCSI protocol wise, the IBM drives are. Their firmware is
* rock solid and their reliability numbers leave Seagate in the dust.
I don't know about that. The IBM DCHS ("Scorpion") drives have been
nothing but problems for us, and need a lot of schmoozing to get them
to work under pressure without locking up. (And I'm sure you know
that too, because it's you who helped me get them run. :)
As far as manufacturing quality (not firmware) goes, IBM drives are
pretty good. We've had ~400 in our systems for about a year and only
one has died outright so far.
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802190448.UAA15764>