Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:51:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280809] jail_attach(2) fails to document reason for EPERM Message-ID: <bug-280809-227-kTqMdZ7Y8f@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280809-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280809 Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olce@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> --- Funnily, I stumbled into the exact same problem today in a different context... That behavior is very indirectly documented through the paragraph: > Further jail(), jail_set(), and jail_attach() call chroot(2) internally, > so they can fail for all the same reasons. Please consult the chroot(2) > manual page for details. I agree that the jail_attach(2) manpage should mention the other "common" reason for getting EPERM (another reason is for the attach to be rejected by the MAC framework, and there are still potentially others). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280809-227-kTqMdZ7Y8f>