Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 21:27:46 +0100 (CET) From: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> To: tischenko@intech.hway.ru (Alexander V. Tischenko) Cc: julian@whistle.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SUID-Directories patch Message-ID: <199711152027.VAA00200@intern> In-Reply-To: <199711140924.MAA00188@thorin.hway.ru> from "Alexander V. Tischenko" at "Nov 14, 97 12:25:57 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > And is in 3.0-current, but doesn't belong in 2.2. On the flip side, > > just because a commercial entity donates code doesn't mean we should > > take it into the source tree lock/stock/and barrel. > > > > > > > > Nate > > I am not shure people running network file servers will be eager to upgrade > to _ANY_ new version unless expressely needed (i will not for shure!), so > to have an incorporated patch for 2.2 that will solve administrative > problems > IS a good thing and also a must. And as for 3.0 - it is very unstable yet > and shurely can't be used for building corporate heavy load servers. > > IMHO, the patch MUST be incorporated. I second that. I will never go away from 2.2 for my productions machines in the near future. If the decision is that it will NOT make it into 2.2, I would greatly appreciate a patch for 2.2.5 :-) Thanks, -Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711152027.VAA00200>