Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:28:14 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@freebsd.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190701072814.3ss6ellsgoixwh6r@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <CALdFvJENynqPAkKSf5ueuG2nBMr9tckikzZOQv9caXtgcwZg4A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <CALdFvJHK0aBF6oLTFNnTiUyrmFUHCPYm3-k7S3_-FpYTHW4WSA@mail.gmail.com> <F208C261-18D8-4E5A-BABE-A9E6D8A52B5B@FreeBSD.org> <CALdFvJENynqPAkKSf5ueuG2nBMr9tckikzZOQv9caXtgcwZg4A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--62qmehxggeijdels
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@bat.ru> a
> > =E9crit :
> > >Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port.
> >
> > It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution, a=
s I
> > said even fedora is on the legacy
> >
> >
> I've committed net/samba410.
>=20
> My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use
> devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep
> using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't happe=
n,
> API still should remain
> the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Python2=
7,
> as far as I can see.
>=20
> New Samba port doesn't use external databases/ldb*, so security/sssd may
> use any of those freely now.
>=20
> The samba4[47] are outdated and should disappear in the middle of the
> August.
>=20
> The samba48 will remain for a while, but not for long, as samba411 us
> pushing from behind. It'll be (hopefully)
> the only consumer of the talloc1/tevent1/tdb1 ports, which should disappe=
ar
> together with Samba 4.8.
>=20
> In general I'd prefer to see SAMBA_DEFAULT to be bumped to 410, but this =
is
> up to the portmgr.
So, as you do not seem to be addressing the problem, what do people do
when they use samba48 and other ports like freeradius3? Right now, they
cannot.
--=20
Mathieu Arnold
--62qmehxggeijdels
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=3ZuX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--62qmehxggeijdels--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190701072814.3ss6ellsgoixwh6r>