Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Jun 2000 10:37:04 GMT
From:      mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa)
To:        dwplists@loop.com ("D. W. Piper")
Cc:        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Interface alias accounting?
Message-ID:  <39378e11.164105511@mail.sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <SEN.959267812.326572421@news.sentex.net>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005180103250.1136-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <00bb01bfc1ab$b141a160$213cd3cf@loop.com> <20000519121531.A73613@setzer.chocobo.cx> <SEN.959267812.326572421@news.sentex.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 May 2000 11:16:52 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.isp you wrote:

>I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who replied.
>
>The consensus was to use ipfw count rules for each IP address, which
>I've found does the job quite well.
>
>Thanks again, folks.  :)

Or, try ipfm from the ports

       ipfm is a bandwidth analysis tool. It counts how much data
       was send and received by specified hosts through an Inter-
       net link.

       ipfm is based on the  libpcap  (ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/libp-
       capi-0.4.tar.Z)  and  should  be  portable.  It was tested
       under Linux, Free BSD and IRIX.

	---Mike
Mike Tancsa  (mdtancsa@sentex.net)		
Sentex Communications Corp,   		
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
"Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers 
could setup a national IP network." (KDW2)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39378e11.164105511>