Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 10:37:04 GMT From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: dwplists@loop.com ("D. W. Piper") Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Interface alias accounting? Message-ID: <39378e11.164105511@mail.sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <SEN.959267812.326572421@news.sentex.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005180103250.1136-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <00bb01bfc1ab$b141a160$213cd3cf@loop.com> <20000519121531.A73613@setzer.chocobo.cx> <SEN.959267812.326572421@news.sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 May 2000 11:16:52 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.isp you wrote: >I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who replied. > >The consensus was to use ipfw count rules for each IP address, which >I've found does the job quite well. > >Thanks again, folks. :) Or, try ipfm from the ports ipfm is a bandwidth analysis tool. It counts how much data was send and received by specified hosts through an Inter- net link. ipfm is based on the libpcap (ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/libp- capi-0.4.tar.Z) and should be portable. It was tested under Linux, Free BSD and IRIX. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39378e11.164105511>